Victims of tiger attack were drunk, high and provoking animals
One of the three victims of San Francisco Zoo tiger attack was intoxicated and admitted to yelling and waving at the animal while standing atop the railing of the big cat enclosure, police said in court documents filed Thursday.
Paul Dhaliwal, 19, told the father of Carlos Sousa Jr., 17, who was killed, that the three yelled and waved at the tiger but insisted they never threw anything into its pen to provoke the cat, according to a search warrant affidavit obtained by the San Francisco Chronicle.
"As a result of this investigation, (police believe) that the tiger may have been taunted/agitated by its eventual victims," according to Inspector Valerie Matthews, who prepared the affidavit. Police believe that "this factor contributed to the tiger escaping from its enclosure and attacking its victims," she said.
Sousa's father, Carlos Sousa Sr., said Dhaliwal told him the three stood on a 3-foot-tall metal railing a few feet from the edge of the tiger moat. "When they got down they heard a noise in the bushes, and the tiger was jumping out of the bushes on him (Paul Dhaliwal)," the documents said.
Police found a partial shoe print that matched Paul Dhaliwal's on top of the railing, Matthews said in the documents.
The papers said Paul Dhaliwal told Sousa that no one was dangling his legs over the enclosure. Authorities believe the tiger leaped or climbed out of the enclosure, which had a wall 4 feet shorter than the recommended minimum.
The affidavit also cites multiple reports of a group of young men taunting animals at the zoo, the Chronicle reported.
Mark Geragos, an attorney for the Dhaliwal brothers, did not immediately return a call late Thursday by The Associated Press for comment. He has repeatedly said they did not taunt the tiger.
Calls to Sousa and Michael Cardoza, an attorney for the Sousa family, also weren't returned.
Toxicology results for Dhaliwal showed that his blood alcohol level was 0.16 — twice the legal limit for driving, according to the affidavit. His 24-year-old brother, Kulbir, and Sousa also had alcohol in their blood but within the legal limit, Matthews wrote.
All three also had marijuana in their systems, Matthews said. Kulbir Dhaliwal told police that the three had smoked pot and each had "a couple shots of vodka" before leaving San Jose for the zoo on Christmas Day, the affidavit said.
Police found a small amount of marijuana in Kulbir Dhaliwal's 2002 BMW, which the victims rode to the zoo, as well as a partially filled bottle of vodka, according to court documents.
Investigators also recovered messages and images from the cell phones, but apparently nothing incriminating in connection with the tiger attack, the Chronicle reported.
Zoo spokesman Sam Singer said he had not seen the documents but believed the victims did taunt the animal, even though they claim they hadn't.
"Those brothers painted a completely different picture to the public and the press," Singer said. "Now it's starting to come out that what they said is not true."
Fendi
Ben Sherman
10 Comments
Post a CommentA tragedy but how stupid! course now they'll be suing the zoo for millions, ugh!
_________________________
and we think to ourselves, what a wonderful world!
Yea, my husband told me about this last night and I was pissed. They had to shoot the tiger only to find out later that the 3 nimb-whits were drunk and taunting the tiger!
What jerks! And how stupid!! Poor tiger.
I have to admit, I'm still not sure I'm comfortable
saying death is what someone deserves for yelling and shouting at an animal. That just seems really harsh.
Yea, I don't think they deserved death either. Maybe a "scared the crap out of them" (literally) kind of experience and a large fine.
That is just insane! I guess you'd have to be drunk and high to think taunting a live tiger is a good idea. Oh, I absolutely want to hurt the other two boys! This really makes me mad!
I wouldn't say anyone deserves death for it, but it is a wild animal, even if enclosed in a zoo...
This would probably qualify for a Darwin Award.
Thats what stupid boys do. Stupid things. The animal shouldnt have been able to get out of its enclosure. No animal should. So thats stupid on the zoos part. So this whole situation is stupid.
~~~
t0x = :inyoface:
idiots. poor tiger. the outcome couldn't be helped though on the parts of the police who only were doing what they thought they needed to. still sucks ass though.
dumbasses. I wish thaty had been straight up from the get-go
Yeah I'm with Tox on this one. Regardless of whether or not an animals being taunted, it should never be able to get out of its enclosure.. thats just not safe. As everyone has already said, they're wild animals so.. I'd say the utmost security is necessary at all times.
Well what I'd really say is zoos suck azz and its wrong to cage wild animals but.. whateva
Ughghghgh poor tiger.
Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.